BullX vs GMGN (2026): Fees, Chains and Features Compared

BullX vs GMGN is a comparison between two multichain memecoin terminals that share a Telegram-login model and a roughly 1% fee, so the headline rate will not decide it for you. BullX Neo charges about 1%; GMGN charges a flat 1% on every buy and sell with no subscription and no surcharge for its sniper, copy trading, or automation. What separates them is documentation, chain coverage, tooling, and how much of each product you can actually verify before you deposit.

That last point matters for this guide. Our fact base for GMGN is deep: fee docs, error codes, chain lists, app-store listings, and DefiLlama data. Our verified fact base for BullX is thin: about 1% fees on Neo, multichain support, and Telegram login. Rather than pad the BullX column with unsourced claims, we compare on what is documented and flag every gap.

This is an independent guide; GMGN AI App Guide is not affiliated with GMGN or BullX. Every number is dated and attributed.

BullX vs GMGN at a glance

"Not verified" means we could not confirm it from BullX's own documentation or a public data source as of September 2026. It does not mean the feature is absent.

What we could verify about BullX, and what we could not

Three facts about BullX are solid enough to build on:

1. Fees are about 1% on BullX Neo. That is in line with GMGN, Axiom, Photon, Trojan, Maestro, and Pump.fun's own Terminal, which all sit at or near 1%. The memecoin-terminal market has converged on this number.
2. BullX is multichain. Like GMGN, it is not a Solana-only product.
3. BullX uses Telegram login. Like GMGN's default flow, that implies the terminal generates and holds wallets for you rather than connecting to a browser extension.

What we could not verify: BullX's exact chain list, whether Neo has copy trading, a wallet tracker, a sniper, or perps, whether it has native mobile apps, whether private keys can be exported, its withdrawal controls, and its fee volume. If you are choosing between gmgn vs bullx neo on any of those dimensions, confirm the BullX side in the BullX app before deciding; do not rely on affiliate pages, which routinely list features that do not exist.

BullX vs GMGN fees: the same 1%, different fine print

At the platform level, both are about 1% per trade. GMGN's fee page (docs.gmgn.ai/index/gmgn-fees-settings) spells out the rest:

• Priority fee: user-set, 0.0001–2 SOL. GMGN recommends 0.002–0.005 SOL for normal trades and 0.006 SOL or more for automated orders. GMGN does not keep this; it goes to validators.
• Tip for private nodes: 0.0001–2 SOL, also passed through.
• Anti-MEV: requires at least 0.002 SOL priority fee plus 0.0001 SOL tip; three modes (off, reduced, secure). Shipped July 2025 with a compensation policy for verified sandwich victims.
• Launchpad fees: Pump.fun-launched tokens carry Pump.fun's own 1% on top, on any terminal.
• Reserve: keep at least 0.05 SOL for gas and rent.

On small positions the priority fee dominates. GMGN's own examples: a 0.1 SOL trade at 0.002 SOL priority fee costs 2% on-chain, at 0.006 SOL it costs 6%, while a 1 SOL trade at 0.006 SOL costs 0.6%. Whatever BullX Neo's default priority fee is, the same arithmetic applies there, so compare the defaults you would actually run, not the 1% headline.

GMGN documents no cashback for traders. Its referral program pays the referrer 10% to 30% of referred users' fees; whether the referred user gets a discount is not in the docs, so verify any "discount code" claim on gmgn.ai/rewards. We could not verify BullX's referral terms. The GMGN fees guide has the complete breakdown, including why GMGN's PnL display does not reliably deduct priority fees.

Chains: multichain on both, but only GMGN's list is documented

GMGN's web terminal runs on Solana, BSC, Ethereum, Base, Tron, Blast, Monad, Robinhood Chain, Arc, and Stable, switched via a URL parameter such as gmgn.ai/?chain=bsc. Its chain mix is not static: Solana was 99.5% of fees in January 2025, BSC reached 58.9% in early August 2026, and a competitor-cited DefiLlama split for August 2026 had Robinhood Chain at 58.6%, BSC at 24.8%, and Solana at 12.7%. GMGN's router handled 4.86M swaps worth $947.5M on Robinhood Chain in one three-day window after the chain's 1 July 2026 launch, per a Medium/Coinmonks analysis.

BullX is also multichain, but we could not verify its list. The practical test is simple: open the BullX chain selector and check for the chain you trade most. If it is Solana, both qualify. If it is Robinhood Chain, Tron, Monad, Arc, or Stable, GMGN's coverage is documented and BullX's is not. The GMGN chains guide explains which GMGN features carry across chains; copy trading, for instance, is Solana-only.

Login and custody: Telegram login on both

Both terminals use Telegram login as a primary flow. On GMGN, Telegram login generates a GMGN-held wallet per chain; Google, email, Phantom, MetaMask, and app QR login are also available, and Telegram and Phantom logins create separate accounts that do not merge. GMGN also offers "Trade with Wallet" via a browser extension wallet, which keeps keys with you but disables Anti-MEV and all automation.

GMGN's custody rules are strict and worth knowing before you compare it to any competitor:

• Private key export is prohibited on all chains, including imported wallets, since around 19 March 2025. GMGN's docs call it a hosted wallet architecture.
• Withdrawals require Google Authenticator 2FA, whitelisted addresses, a 3-hour hold after the first whitelist or an address change, a 24-hour hold after re-binding 2FA, and can only be done on the website, not the bot.
• No key-based recovery is documented if you lose your Telegram account.
• Track record: no verified infrastructure hack as of September 2026; an October 2025 phishing incident hit about 107 users and GMGN promised 100% compensation.

We could not verify BullX's export, withdrawal, or recovery rules. The safe assumption for both is that a terminal wallet is a hot trading account, not storage. The is GMGN safe guide and the GMGN withdraw and export guide cover the details.

Copy trading and automation

This is where GMGN's documentation gives it a clear, testable edge in a gmgn vs bullx comparison, regardless of what BullX may or may not offer.

GMGN's copy trading, per docs.gmgn.ai:

• Solana only, up to ten concurrent tasks, requires Telegram-style login.
• Buy methods: Fixed buy or Max follow-buy (proportional).
• Sell methods: follow-sell, no-follow, TP/SL, batched TP/SL.
• Filters: market cap, liquidity, token age, burnt ratio, min/max copy amount, position-increase count, launchpad, and a 20-token blacklist.
• Lightning Mode: about two seconds faster, returns unconfirmed messages, rollback risk.
• Auto-pause after three consecutive failures. Typical reported latency 2–5 seconds.

GMGN's automation stack beyond copy trading: limit buy and sell, TP/SL, batched TP/SL, trailing take-profit, dev-sell auto-sell, migrated snipe and migrated sell, auto buy, and a sniper for first-block entries. Limit orders are capped at 100 active per account; auto-created TP/SL orders are valid for 24 hours. There is no shorting, no perps, and no paper trading.

The cost of copy trading is the same 1% plus priority fee per leg. GMGN's own break-even math at 0.006 SOL per leg is about 14% on a 0.1 SOL copy, 4.4% on 0.5 SOL, 3.2% on 1 SOL, and 2.6% on 2 SOL. That is true on any 1% terminal, so if BullX Neo offers copy trading it faces the same arithmetic. Read the GMGN copy trading guide and the limit orders and stop-loss guide before running automation anywhere.

Wallet tracking and discovery tools

GMGN's discovery layer is the reason many traders keep it open even when they execute elsewhere:

• Trenches: New, Almost Bonded, and Migrated columns across Pump.fun, letsbonk, Raydium LaunchLab, and other launchpads, with hotkey buying and saveable filter presets.
• Wallet Tracker and Wallet Radar: follow wallets with alerts.
• Smart Money leaderboard, KOL/VC tracker, X Tracker: surface who is buying and which contract addresses are being tweeted.
• Security panel per token: mint authority, freeze/blacklist, top-10 holder share, LP burned, rug probability, dev rug history, honeypot (ETH), contract verified, ownership renounced, buy/sell tax, insiders, snipers, bundlers, phishing flag, dev-sold status.
• Holder labels: Smart Degen, Bot Degen, Fresh wallet, Sniper, KOL, Phishing.

We could not verify BullX's equivalents. If discovery and tracking are your main use, GMGN's wallet tracker and Trenches sniper guides show what is documented and how to configure it.

Mobile apps

GMGN ships native apps: "GMGN - Meme Track" on iOS (seller GraceMatrix Technologies Limited, iOS 15.6+, about 238.7 MB) and "GMGN" on Android (package com.gmgn.app, developer GMGN Labs Limited, 100K+ downloads, about 3.9 stars from roughly 1,320 ratings, updated 21 August 2026 per Google Play). The app has Discover, Monitor, Track, Assets, and Order tabs. Withdrawals still require the website. GMGN also runs per-chain Telegram bots (@GMGN_sol_bot, @GMGN_bsc_bot, @GMGN_swap_bot, @GMGN_base_bot, @GMGN_tron_bot) that can buy, sell, and set up copy trades but cannot withdraw.

We could not verify whether BullX has native mobile apps. If you trade from a phone, check for a store listing under a verifiable developer name before installing anything; typosquat apps and domains target both brands.

Volume and market share

Per DefiLlama fee adapters read 8 September 2026, GMGN earned $2.56M in 24 hours, $19.05M over 7 days, and $45.50M over 30 days, a 40.2% share of tracked terminals, with $303.4M lifetime. Its peak month was October 2025 at $44.6M, with a record day of $6.87M on 8 October 2025.

BullX was not among the terminals in the DefiLlama fee set we read, so there is no comparable number. That is a data gap, not a verdict on BullX's size. The terminals that were in the set: Axiom at $39.04M (34.5%), FOMO at $24.98M (22.1%), Maestro at $1.73M, Trojan at $1.18M, Photon at $0.71M, and BONKbot at $0.10M. The GMGN vs Axiom comparison covers the one competitor with a comparable fee figure.

Who should pick BullX, and who should pick GMGN?

Pick GMGN if you:

• want every feature documented before you deposit: fees, error codes, copy-trade rules, withdrawal holds,
• trade across Solana, BSC, Base, Ethereum, Tron, or Robinhood Chain,
• rely on copy trading, wallet tracking, or the security panel,
• want native iOS and Android apps plus Telegram bots on one account.

Consider BullX if you:

• already use it and its multichain coverage includes your chains,
• prefer its interface or its Telegram login flow,
• have verified in the app that it has the specific feature you need.

Use both if you want GMGN's discovery tools and want to test BullX Neo's execution on the same tokens. Fees are close enough that the deciding factor will be fills and tooling, which you can only judge by trading small on each. The GMGN alternatives page lists the rest of the field.

Bottom line

• Fees: both about 1%; BullX Neo about 1%, GMGN a flat 1% with no subscription. Priority fee settings matter more than the platform fee on small trades.
• Chains: both multichain; GMGN's ten-chain list is documented, BullX's list was not verified.
• Login: Telegram on both; GMGN also offers Google, email, Phantom, MetaMask, and QR.
• Features: GMGN documents copy trading, sniper, automation, wallet tracking, and mobile apps; the BullX equivalents were not verified for this guide.
• Custody: GMGN prohibits key export and gates withdrawals with 2FA; treat both as hot trading accounts.
• Volume: GMGN $45.5M in 30-day fees (DefiLlama, 8 Sept 2026); no comparable BullX figure.

The honest bullx vs gmgn verdict is that GMGN wins on what can be verified, and BullX Neo may or may not match it on the parts we could not check. Start from the GMGN AI app hub for setup guides, or Open GMGN and compare the two with a small position on the same token.

Sources: GMGN documentation, DefiLlama, official app store listings and GMGN's public channels. See our methodology. Last reviewed 2026-09-22.